Damage limitation?

THERE seems to be little point in maintaining the continuous moorer debate since it is getting nowhere, writes Kevin McNiff.

There has always been a case of 'methinks they do protest too much' but given the apparent strangle-hold that the Human Rights Act [HRA] has over CaRT, must we continually be harangued by individual cases of litigation?

For all to see

It's a bit like watching paint dry, or that BBC sail-along-the Kennet & Avon programme which at least highlighted, nationally, the facts for all to see.

Given that there is no way CaRT can move on the plethora of continuous moorers, it should simply designate all the affected areas as 'Low Impact Residential' and create a mooring fee based on local facilities. This can be added to the Annual Cruising [sic] Licence and collected in the usual way. At the same time, clear all visitor designated moorings to allow bona fide boaters of all persuasions to carry out the business of boating.

No 'free lunch'

I don't think there is anywhere in the HRA that entitles anyone to a 'free lunch' so rather than keep trying to hit the issue head-on, CaRT could at least mitigate its current standing. Of course there will still be arguments and enforcement action over non-payment and it may enrage the local councils, but maybe it would be a step in the right direction. Surely it's worth a punt?!