email the editor

Emails

Anglers to get priority?

Tring Anglers have long been 'carping' about the lack of fishing pegs between the bottom lock at Marsworth and the Aylesbury arm and have suggested that British Waterways give over the visitor moorings close to the lock in return for them 'policing' fishing above and below the lock. This will give the anglers at least three more pegs.

British Waterways are considering the proposals and are consulting moorers. Not sure where boaters will be able to stop, either to visit the White Lion or work the lock. The carp in this section are tame and regularly fed by visitors and have not been included in British Waterways' consultation procedure.

The water point at Bulbourne has been partially blocked by a British Waterways mud hopper for sometime and two anglers set up directly in front of the tap last week, perhaps boaters would therefore show some consideration and take on water at British Waterways' yard (Marsworth) or Cowroast.

Mike Griffin

Stuck in a lock

In February 2007 We had a similar accident to Abigail. We were travelling on the Staffs & Worcs from Kidderminster to Stourport. We entered Falling Sands Lock and started to drop the water level.As the level dropped the front of the boat jammed and the back still dropped.

I quickly dropped the paddles and then slowly opened the top gate paddle and slowly filled the lock, Bringing the back of the boat back up and level. I then discovered that two small logs had entered the lock with us and had jammed between the boat and the lock.The front of the boat had jammed in the lock and left us in the same position as Abigail, Bow in the air and stern at the bottom of the lock.

We were later informed by another boater that contractors for British Waterways had been cutting down trees a short distance upstream from the lock and that they had left the cut logs in a pile on the towpath. Local kids had been seen throwing the logs into the canal.

We sent an Incident Form into British Waterways in February 2007, but as of yet have not received a reply. I would therefore suggest that Abigail's accident may be due to a floating object in the lock.

Paul Edwards, Nb Dream On. (Cruising the French Canals)


It was obvious

Di Harrison asks how I knew that the boats moored opposite Sainsbury's on the Grand Union were either continuous cruisers or continuous moorers.

Well, Di, we stayed there to stock up from the supermarket and have lunch, and as you do, you speak to other boaters, and the ones I referred to were licenced yet not on a paid-for moorings, so like many others I kept a record.

We then went down the Grand Union to the Paddington Arm and the Regent's Canal then up the Lee to Hertford, then a cruise along the Stort to Bishop's Stortford. Then it was back to Limehouse Basin and a cruise up the Thames to Brentford and the Grand Union again.

Eventually, six weeks and three days later we once again moored opposite Sainsbury's to stock up, and those same boats were still there in exactly the same places.

That is, Di, how I knew they were continuous moorers. I would have thought it obvious.

Being retired, we move about the system where the fancy takes us, but we don't abuse the system by pretending we are continuous cruisers, but pay for a yearly mooring.

Gillian Stokes

Getting his MP involved

I've asked my MP to write to British Waterways (Robin Evans) with regard to it buying Polish boats and local boatbuilders going out of business.

My MP is John Maples and he is the MP for the Stratford area. If anybody living in his constituency would like to raise the lock notices issue with him his email is maplesj@parliament.uk and I'm sure he will use the same channels.

Graham Phillips

Sympathies

My sympathies go to Gillian Stokes who has been 'harrisoned'. Terry and Di Harrison, narrowboat Ruby are very forthright and scathing in their emails regarding other people's opinions.

Bertie Bracket

Lock signs

Most of the beams on the locks from Shireoaks to Thorpe on the Chesterfield Canal have the smaller signs which I presumed was because those locks are listed monuments despite there being plenty of room for the bigger signs.

The notable exception on that stretch appears to be Boundary Lock (41a) which is not an original. Certainly all the locks around Retford have the full monty including the explanation which tell you to keep forward of the cill marking on the wall (which is okay if you're going down, a tight squeeze if you're not).

David Morris

Appreciation

We would like to send our gratitude and sincere thanks through your site, to a lovely couple called Graham & Vera (plus dogs Megan and Molly) on narrowboat Penny Peace.

They came to our rescue whilst cruising the Peak Forest Canal. We had an electrical fire, which took out the 12V system, this meant we couldn't start our engine therefore needed a tow. Having found a place to get repairs done, somewhere quite local, they offered to tow us there the very next day—in the pouring rain I might add! They wanted no reimbursement for diesel, so we suggested we could treat them to lunch. It seemed such a small price to pay, but both of them wanted no great fuss made of their kindness.

So please convey our best wishes and thanks to our Good Samaritans Graham and Vera, who have been true 'continuous cruisers' for nearly 20 years. May they continue for another 20 years—God bless 'em!

Terry, Di and Harry, NB Ruby

Definitely toeing the party line

Your correspondent, who had his letter responding to the British Waterways' 'Rose tinted glasses' view of the waterways today, printed (albeit heavily censored) in the Daily Mail, fared better than I. My very similar letter making all the same points didn’t trouble the pages of the Daily Telegraph.

Tony Collins

No trouble at all

Having just read your site and especially the one on Bandits, I thought that anyone reading it,who was thinking of trying boating , would be put off for life.

However, I would like to point out that not everything is as black.

During late April, May and early June this year my wife and I did a six weeks, 450 miles cruise during which time we did not have any incidents from bandits. Starting at Shardlow then onto Burton, Stoke, Middlewich, Wigan, Blackburn, Burnley, Skipton, Leeds, then down onto the Navigations to Keadby. Up the Trent to Stockwith covering the Chesterfield Canal, then south again to Torksey onto Lincoln and return, then towards home via Newark, Nottingham and Sawley.

This was a wonderful cruise, no problem whatsoever. Very helpful British Waterways staff and not a sign of any potential trouble. Yes I did have a camera ready but it was not needed.

Were we just lucky or are things changing. Who knows, we will just have to wait and see.

Phil and Jacky Aspley, NB Duck Duck Charlie Brown

Report them

Having watched with interest British Waterways' attempts to raise the cost of boating and because of the increase in mooring fees which follows its raising of the cost of boatyard leases as they fall due I recently asked the Office of Fair Trading to consider whether or not British Waterways was acting as a cartel by effectively setting the charges to match those charged by the independent British Waterways Marinas Ltd.

I eventually got a standard letter in reply saying that the request to investigate mooring charges did not fall within their 'administrative priorities' or even within the 'framework' used to determine such priorities. I have asked them to clarify how they determine priorities and have pointed out that my request was not specifically about charges but as to whether two public bodies are acting as a cartel and that this is a serious charge which deserves better than a standard letter. The Office of Fair Trading say that the request will remain on file and the decision be reviewed should other referrals support it.

If you have found your mooring charges have increased beyond the rate of inflation and you suspect or know that increased leasing costs are the reason please write to the Office of Fair Trading and say so. Hugh Cauldwell

Sheer stupidity

On my journey from Wigan to the Anderton Boat lift for a couple of days cruising the Weaver with my dad and brother, I witnessed the most stupid case of adult idiocy in my 6 years on the waterways.

Whilst waiting for passage through Saltersford Tunnel there was a guy in a small inflatable dingy with three small children no older than eight waiting to go through too! No lights and a small outboard which incidentally cut out once or twice.

He proceeded in behind a hired narrowboat and I reluctantly and at a good distance behind followed on. Ironically the first narrowboat had to stop and reverse as they had bicycles on the roof that started scraping the tunnel roof, fortunately at this point I'd not entered the tunnel.

My brother shouted to the guy that I'd prefer if he didn't enter between the two boats, to which the guy started an argument about his rights etc. When the first narrowboat had reversed out he shot off in front of us both.

We caught up with him again in the basin at the far end of Barnton Tunnel where he was preparing to go back through them both!

I told him it was the most stupid thing to do and for the sake of the kids pack it in. He gestured that I was an idiot with a lot of arm waving. We left him to it and I reported it to the British Waterway guy at the boat lift. The consequences if he broke down in the tunnel with 30 tons of steel coming through after him, and the narrowboat captain not seeing him, is unthinkable.

Roy Fawcett

The right lines

I note from a recent piece in the Financial Times that a company called Clarity Commerce Solutions have been awarded a contract to help manage Amsterdam’s historic waterways. Maybe British Waterways should award a similar contract—at least the company name is on the right lines!

Roger Fox

Collect payment

I wonder how much money British Waterways is collecting at the 24 hours moorings at Cropredy.

It must be making quite a killing this week as boats wait for the Fairport Convention next weekend.

You can't moor anywhere near the village this week! Not that it is easy at any time, the 14 days moorings south of the village seem to contain the same boats every time we pass.

Now that British Waterways have tackled a lot of the unlicensed boats, and even removed some of them, perhaps it is about time they tackled the 14 day overstayers, and charged fees where boats will not move on time limited mooring at hot spots.

Jan and Malcolm, Bournemouth

Protected species

I had to laugh at Vera & Graham Lambden's statement 'British Waterways already have the power to move the itinerant boaters on after 14 days—they are called Mooring Wardens'.

They surely must be a protected species, for there must be hundreds of continuous moorers that moor on the best sites for a lot longer than 14 days.

As a regular user of the Trent & Mersey around Derwent Mouth, I was overjoyed to see the picture on narrowboatworld of the three that had been moored there for two months. And they were moored in exactly the same place last year, for months on end. So what price the mooring wardens?

I wonder if it's the same as those you reported at Hack Green, who had a 'friendly British Waterways' man who turned a blind eye?

Whilst on the subject there is the boat Just Because We Can that has been stuck on the 48 hours mooring just a little way up the canal on the rings at Shardlow for the past nine days to my knowledge. Not on the same rings, for yesterday when I saw the boat it had moved about 75 yards to another set of rings, though still on 48 hours moorings. Perhaps the owner, moving backward and forward on 48 hours moorings will not be noticed!

Going back to the three in the photograph, with the addition of the extra one, they are at the end of the pilings, just out of 'reach' of the stink caused by the Westerly winds off the sewage works, whilst such as I are forced to moor further down right in the 'flow'.

'Sooty' Black

Not worth it

When I saw the headline 'Demonstrations at the National' I though Oh good, Inland Waterways Association is at last doing a bit of campaigning, telling Robin and Co to sort out the mess—might be worth going afterall.

But no—it turns out to be cookery and street dancing (whatever that is). As Ideal Homes Exhibitions are not really my thing, not worth going then.

Chris Phillips, Leicester

What were they?

I quote: 'One may move the other may not but both take up moorings and usually good visitor moorings'. Unquote.

So do those who actually leave their marina's, so that makes us equal.

Quote: 'When I wanted to moor near Sainsbury's at Hemel Hempstead, they were taking up all the best spaces'. Unquote.

How does she [Gillian Stokes—email] know that they were either 'Continuous Moorers' or 'Continuous Cruisers' and not 'Continuous Marina's' on a day out?

Keith Makemson

Had their money eventually

We vacated our mooring at Sawley on the 18th June, still with our damaged paintwork due to over zealous British Waterways employee and his pressure washer, gangway cleaning.

We were promised paint for repair but it never happened. Ended up with £40 off final mooring bill. Mooring here at Brinklow is more reasonable. Bags more room between the boats, and I can finally get to the rear of my boat of 45ft without climbing along the gunnels.

Richard Frontrichard, Diane Emily Jayne

Good Service

I’ve just had occasion to use Wheel Freedom wheelchair hire when taking my 92 year old father on a hire boat. The chair was there ready on arrival and collected afterwards all with no fuss whatever.

Very good service.

John Harwood

In good company

I see that Robin Evans is in good company when he has his 'Visions'.

David Icke has been having them for years; part of the subtitle of one of his booklets is'Exposing the dreamworld that we believe to be real.

Iain Powell

Should see it coming

Just would like to say in reference to the latest news: 'British Waterways anticipate a much lower performance than they hoped for in their property portfolio.'

No S**t Sherlock. Didn't need a crystal ball to see that one coming!

What we were able to take from the meeting at Hatton last year was that British Waterways saw an 8% (10% at the time) rise in licence fees as making more business sense that a 1% rise on its commercial revenue (even though a 1% rise according to their own figures handed out at the meeting would bring in a much greater amount of money), and a belief that more revenue would be forthcoming as they expected a steady rise in new boaters.

Given that the current economic situation has been months in the coming, you may have though that people charged with running a public body would at least have some business sense. What do you think the first thing to go is when times get hard and disposable income is squeezed? Answers on the back of a postcard please...

L Moore

PS What do you expect from someone who thinks boaters prefer to moor in 'safer' urban areas. Great 'Vision' Robin—Should have gone to Specsavers.

Cruising or mooring

Terry Harrison wants someone to tell a previous emailer about the difference between continuous cruisers and continuous moorers, but surely from a monetary point of view they are exactly the same, they do not pay any mooring fees.

One may move the other may not, but both take up moorings, and usually good visitor moorings too.

When I wanted to moor near Sainsbury's at Hemel Hempstead, they were taking up all the best spaces, and as to whether they were there for a day or for eternity, it made no difference, they were there.

The sooner they pay for the privilege the better.

Gillian Stokes

To safeguard email contributors from unwanted responses, our policy, unless requested, is not to include email address or pass these on to any third party under any circumstances.

Maintenance suffering

The general standard of lock maintenance on the northern Grand Union is not good. At Radford the top gate handrail is bent and has been taped off.

#

What happens if there is an emergency while both bottom gates are open? It had to be said that many south Grand Union handrails remain in use and are always more bent than this one. One bottom paddle is out of use at two locks and the cill leakage is bad at many. If there were no backpumping several pounds would be dry, so bad is the leakage.

Roger Fox

Solving a problem

There has been quite a bit of correspondence here lately of boats being set adrift. Can I suggest a trick I use which is to always carry some of the zip type cable ties.

One of these on a centre rope or one at each end snapped tight if the rope is through a ring or right against a bollard is sufficient to leave vandals needing a Stanley knife or similar when you moor in a dubious area. Care should be taken when using this on rivers however unless one is moored to a floating pontoon, if using the method on other river moorings take care to leave a way of cutting the ties convenient to hand in case of rising water levels.

John Harwood


The cost

Reading this morning's Headline News regarding British Waterways having to apply for planning permission to affix notices to lock beams, the article does not seem to touch on the subject of cost.

Are British Waterways required to pay the council's fee for an application per council district as in a one off payment to Stratford Council who have many locks within their boundaries or is it a payment per flight or, heaven forbid, a payment exceeding £100 per lock?

Considering, in my opinion they are sited in completely the wrong place anyway, should British Waterways not reconsider placing them at all?

Graham Phillips

Out of touch

Victor is right in his comments about Robin Evans being out of touch with genuine boaters. Where did Mr. Evans get his information from, that boaters prefer to moor in urban areas?

I would imagine like us, most genuine and long term cruisers, would not moor in an urban area, other than for shopping of course, but most certainly not overnight.

Why? Because all the morons, pissheads and louts come out to play; especially on Friday, Saturday and Sunday ,and after a few too many drinks they are bent on causing some poor person grief. So, who is it then you ask, who takes up all the visitor moorings? We find it's usually the hire boaters, as they sometimes come unprepared,or even the shiny boat brigade, who can only come out to play at weekends.

Or it could be those inconsiderate continuous moorers again! Stir stir...

Terry Harrison, NB Ruby

Them and us

So Gillian Stokes found she couldn't moor by Sainsbury's [Grand Union Canal] due to other boats being there eh? She refers to the boats as 'they' (who are 'they'?) being moored there instead of her.

Surely she would have been one of them should she have got up earlier? Well, haven't we all felt like that at some time, not getting where we'd like to be moored? Being continuous cruisers we have always found it a good ploy to beat these people by getting up early to get the best mooring (for shopping especially).

But we want to know how the lady knew they were continuous cruisers or continuous moorers? Does one knock on the boat and enquire? 'Oh I say does one live on ones boat or are you one of us...I don't think so!

One obviously assumed Gillian, not good practice for the canal life...tut tut Madam. Maybe one should try for a mooring outside Marks & Spencers or Waitrose...maybe a better chance of a more suitable mooring for one!

Di Harrison ('er indoors on NB Ruby)

Why?

Why are British Waterways pouring millions into new canal projects when they cannot maintain existing waterways. The article about the Kennet & Avon sits alongside one for promoting the Bedford Milton Keynes link. It is beyond belief!

Kevin McNiff

One and the same

The Office of Fair Trading have written to tell me that '...as British Waterways Marinas Ltd is a wholly owned subsidiary of British Waterways it may be considered to be a single economic entity and therefore Chapter 1 (of the Competition Act 1998) may not apply...'.

I had thought that British Waterways went to some lengths to say that British Waterways Marinas Ltd was a completely separate concern but perhaps my memory fails me. Can anyone cast any light on this? Hugh Cauldwell

Ready to pounce

I wonder if anyone had noticed that if the National Waterways Museum picture does show a ghostly arm poking out from behind a barrel, then the forearm is nearly as short as the hand. Maybe it's not a human ghost, but an alien?

Speaking of which, note the roll of Defra Rash in the far left background just waiting its chance to pounce.

Tony Haynes, Ghost Buster

A waste of time

I should be going to meet the 'visionary' Robin Evans today in Banbury, but I simply do not have the time. Anyway I have attended two meetings with him and Simon Salem in the last seven months.

Until British Waterways tackle the basic issues of general maintenance, unlicensed boats, overstaying moorers and waterway businesses taking the p**s by leaving their boats on honey site moorings, nothing much will change for me.

I'm retired, have paid for a cruising and mooring permit ever since we launched our boat, and will be deeply affected by the increases in fees and diesel.

It's the same old same old Robin and Simon, saying they listen to stakeholders, want to shake up local councils to pay for their amenity etc. etc., but are they actually 'listening' to the boaters—and their staff—who are closer to the water than they will ever be? I don't reckon so.

And if they want to cut costs out of the business, perhaps they should start with their board—after all it has allegedly paid £600k to have consultants tell them what they already know. But then the muck sticks with the consultants if it goes t**s up.

Kevin McNiff

Pull the other one

So there has been a rise of 13% in the number of visitors to the towpath according to British Waterways.

It seems those black boxes that suddenly appeared by the side of the canals have registered the number of 'passes', and from these the magic figure of 13% has been produced.

But they were not there a year ago!

There is no mention of the period of that elusive 13%. It couldn't have been a year, so my guess is that the base figure was during the winter months, then the second figure was for spring and summer months.

And guess what? An increase in towpath 'feet'. Pull the other one.

'Sooty' Black

Two sides

Just to show that there are two sides to every story, we were nearly set adrift recently, along with a dozen other boats, in Market Drayton. We understand that this was not an isolated event.

The following night, we moored near to bridge 66 and were having a peaceful barbecue when a hire boat came along and moored about 100 yards from us.

One of the crew walked along the towpath and said he hoped we did not mind him mooring there as it was the only place he could get in. He added that we would not be disturbed.

He was as good as his word. We both enjoyed a quiet evening away from it all. It just proves there are a few considerate folk left.

Graham Booth

Could be right

I suspect that I may be right in my thoughts for Victor about the bollards, if this piece from Richard Swan is correct:

'Because Robin Evans is visiting the area tomorrow and they have to show that they are complying with his commands but are unable to do this properly because the locks are listed and they have to get listed structure consent to affix the notices. Something actually takes precedence over Health & Safety!'

Roger Fox

Those bollards

Whilst cruising up the Llangollen canal we noticed the 'new bollards' being added to the single locks, which you have been stating on your narrowboatworld pages, and agree are a complete waste of our money.

#

We totally agree with the comments on your pages and ask what is British Waterways up to? One lock (see picture) is a joke. How can they justify adding another three new bollards to a lock which originally had two very old ones from the past?

I wonder what the old 'working boatman' would comment if they had a say in today's canals. Is Health and Safety waiting to trip someone up?

R & M Debnam, Karma Waters PHOTO Debnam

Need permission for bollards?

Today’s piece mentions the requirements for Listed Building Consent to add permanent signs to the locks. If this is the case then the rather more permanence of bollards must certainly require permission.

I know from my day to day work that this is a lengthy procedure which, among other things, requires advertisement of the application and display of public notices adjacent to the site of the proposed works. Just imagine this over the whole network!

Roger Fox

Toeing the party line

Thankyou for publishing my letter to the Daily Mail in full, something that they indeed published, but edited heavily.

It's a shame when national newspapers take this action, they did the same over the accident at 'Willowbridge Marina' showing a tower crane instead of a tracked crane.

I have now tracked down the Editor's name, (the paper had been filed on a small nail in a small room) and asked them to print my letter in full.

Mike Griffin

Genuine continuous cruisers

I feel it is a great shame to persecute a group of people who are lucky enough to be able to genuinely continuously cruise the system. They have done nothing wrong apart from make other people perhaps jealous and upset the shiny boat owners, of which I am bored of hearing wittering on.

We can’t all be lucky enough to be able to afford a house and a boat and a top notch marina, and some of us actually would prefer not to be crammed in like sardines, but each to his own. The waterways have been around longer than most of us, and have been used and lived on for hundred’s of years.

They were not, believe it or not built just for shiny boats to cruise on for two weeks of the year moaning endlessly about other boats daring to be moored somewhere, anywhere when it means they have to make an effort to slow down to pass them. I presume at some point of your journey, you also have to moor up at some point.

Whilst no-one disagrees that there are those who don’t follow the rules, that is there look out, and it can be annoying when nice prime moorings are being taken up, however without proof, you can simply point fingers and accuse every boater that doesn’t conform to your high standards of being a continuous moorer abusing the system.

Why should continuous cruisers have to pay more for being lucky enough to be able to cruise permanently? I am very jealous, but only because I would love to do the same and am unable to due to work and family commitments. However, I would not wish extra costs of them, especially when a large group of those people will be retired and on limited incomes.

The waterways are used by a diverse group of people, just as they should be. Take a chill pill and enjoy your time in your boat. It is supposed to be a relaxing!

Angela Cluley

In the wrong place

I'm a big fan of community involvement in the canals through organisations like Groundwork, but I was both amused and saddened by the picture accompanying the article, which shows what appear to be mooring bollards set back several feet from the canal edge.

Is this an invitation for boaters to tie ropes across the red cinder footpath or are these bollards now just ornamental? Looks like talking to boaters was not part of the process in that case? Lets hope 'mistakes' like the one illustrated will be avoided in the future?

Simon Robbins, London

Pity!

Narrowboat kills rower—nearly. What a shame. That would have been one less arrogant non-licence paying waterway user.

Seymour Bridges

Those numbers

Railway bridges also have numbers and, as the railway rebuilt the bridge at Huddlesford, they probably put 'their' number on it. In sequence when counting along the railway but out of order for the cut.

George Boyle

Cruisers and moorers

I read today, the email from Mr.T.Harrison and mostly agree with what he writes. My concern is that British Waterways in its infinite wisdom, is trying to separate the folks who moor on moorings from the genuine Continuous Cruisers.

Having spent many years as a shop steward, I would point out the union's motto: United we stand—divided we fall. According to NABO News, the Association of Pleasure Craft Operators is suggesting contiuous cruisers pay an annual fee of £1,500 for their licence enabling them to do what any licenced boater is entitled to do: i.e. cruise all year and wherever they please. If this was adopted, and British Waterways would almost certainly love it, the next stage would be increasing the licenced moorer's fees accordingly.

We must all stand together against such hair-brained suggestions and support each other. To return to Mr.Harrison's email, British Waterways already have the power to move the itinerant boaters on after 14 days—they are called Mooring Wardens.

Being a continuous cruiser of 17 years, I have never overstayed the mooring limit and usually move on after four days or so. If British Waterways are really so desperate to bring more cash into its coffers, it should be enforcing mooring regulations and ensuring every boater has an up to date licence displayed.

Car owners pay a licence to use the roads irregardless of how often they use them—boaters should have the same choice. Genuine continuous cruisers will pay more in tax as they are using more diesel—but don't get me started on the subject of diesel prices and taxation!

Vera & Graham Lambden, NB Penny Peace